Don Keelan: What was not accomplished in Montpelier
And judging from the outcome of five months of meetings, the most important matter facing Vermont was not addressed - how do we keep our young people here and, at the same time, bring in others? And it is wishful thinking to believe that the recently approved Vermont Remote Workers Grant Program or Stay-to-Stay are the panacea.
Collectively, young people and their families are a critical resource, needed to fill the thousands of open job positions, bring income tax revenue to a hard-pressed state treasury, fill vacant seats on nonprofit and municipal boards, and volunteer at our state's fire and rescue services.
Of course, another assignment for the younger adults would be in response to a May 26, 2018 Wall Street Journal piece, "Overcrowded School Classrooms? Not in Vermont." The piece noted that the school population in Vermont is now close to 76,000, down from over 104,000 in the late 1990s. It goes on to note that, next to Maine and New Hampshire, Vermont has the highest median age, at 42.7.
And what is turning out to be an unsustainable situation is that our state's per-pupil spending, according to the WSJ, is $17,873, versus a national average of $11,762, approximately 52 percent greater and only getting worse.
Back in January in a column on these pages, I asked the legislators if, during their 2018 session, they could just stay focused on one issue, the shrinking Vermont workforce. Five months later, it is quite evident that my request fell on deaf ears. Too many pet projects (bills) seemed to have been more important.
Of course, for some in the legislature, it was more important that Vermont legalize the retail sale of marijuana and, by doing so, maybe the state might retain its youth with others to come and reside here. For others, it was to increase the minimum wage to $15 per hour and at the same time provide a family leave bill that would pay for employees to take time off. Such pieces of legislation just might attract more people to come and work here - more wishful thinking!
Part of Vermont's problem in finding employees, as well as retaining those who are here, can be directly related to a lack of workforce housing, programs, and entertainment geared toward the younger generation, as well as a diversity of workplace opportunities. A deficit in WiFi and cell phone coverage are also high on the list.
Another problem Vermont has (and I am sure other states as well) is the fact that we have close to 7,000 of our young people now in recovery treatment centers for a variety of addiction reasons. The number is staggering and costly in so many ways. If the programs being dispensed are in any way successful, it will be years before this potential source of labor will be close to being productive.
Governor Phil Scott has called attention to the crisis of a depleting workforce and its ramifications. He even has it down to the number of young people who leave the state on a daily basis. So why don't our legislators get the message? How many companies must leave Vermont before Montpelier realizes the crisis we are in?
No one in Montpelier blinked an eye when the long time Bennington manufacturing company, Plasan, NA, left Bennington in 2016 for Grand Rapids, MI and with it went over 300 well-paying jobs and an outstanding corporate citizen. Why? The company could not attract skilled workers.
The Governor has called the legislature back into special session to deal with taxes, the budget, and a host of other Bills. He should do what he has to in keeping them in session and have them deal with the crisis of Vermont's shrinking workforce.
Don Keelan writes a bi-weekly column and lives in Arlington.
TALK TO US
If you'd like to leave a comment (or a tip or a question) about this story with the editors, please email us. We also welcome letters to the editor for publication; you can do that by filling out our letters form and submitting it to the newsroom.